19 Feb 2018 15:38:28
Is it just me or did Sacko look better against Bristol? Seemed to have something. His initial touch was good and his pace dragged two or three defenders across every time. Looked more of a threat than Alioski has for a while. A few games to see if he can provide the final decent pass/cross or finish himself might be in order. Given our position and players available he might be worth a go. Just coming off the bench for 20/30 minutes maybe.


1.) 19 Feb 2018
19 Feb 2018 16:08:17
Agree Hess, Sacko did well. I'd like to see him do it for 90 mins though. I think as we've all said before if he had a good first touch and could put in a decent cross, he could be something special.


2.) 19 Feb 2018
19 Feb 2018 16:48:27
Caused problems with his pace but his crossing is still poor


3.) 19 Feb 2018
19 Feb 2018 18:32:38
No I agree Hess Sacko did ok, maybe with some work he will improve further.


4.) 19 Feb 2018
19 Feb 2018 19:32:59
Lets face it, last 3 managers have all persevered with Sacko, they must have seen something in him at training.


5.) 19 Feb 2018
19 Feb 2018 21:49:23
Guys please please stop with the Sacko stuff. If he had a good touch, if he could cross, if he could pass! He’s a professional footballer for gods sake he should be able to do all those things as they are basic footballing skills. Two goals in 48 games tells its own story, he has had plenty of opportunities, he is a Division Two player at best, simply not good enough.


6.) 19 Feb 2018
19 Feb 2018 22:45:18
Is his contract up.


7.) 19 Feb 2018
19 Feb 2018 23:15:59
Sacko is in the wrong Sport he should stick to track events like the 100 metres


8.) 20 Feb 2018
20 Feb 2018 08:26:26
I've wondered for sometime why we don't just play him as a central striker He's fast, and when he has scored its been a decent finish. Just crossing he struggles with