Leeds Rumours Archive February 09 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us leeds transfer rumours.


(single word yields best result)

09 Feb 2012 12:39:13
Paul Lambert strong in the betting today...he's not being backed for no reason surely. Perhaps he thinks he's taken Norwich as far a he can and it's time for a new challenge?

Believable14 Unbelievable23

Oh dream on children you are a small club in a small town in a dump part of the country, the only good thing about Leeds is the road out, Paul Lambert is on a 3mil a year and has 5 years to see his 7 year plan out, then if he see's that he can't take us any further he will go to a much bigger club than the both of us. some say that will be either Arsenal or Man Utd

Agree0 Disagree0

What the hell you on about Lambert not backed, It's obvious you are not of mature age to understand what he said months ago when he signed his new contract, Paul Lambert will not be going to a dead beat club run by a fat cat controler like Master bates, Do you think he will top his 3mil a year Lambert's on now

Agree0 Disagree0

If you think he hasn't been backed then go to odds checker and look at the movement between yesterday morning and now. Average price of 21/1 yesterday, average price of 8/1 now. I'm not saying he's going to get it, I'm just saying there isn't normally that kind of movemnt on a manager who's in work without there being something behind it. I think he has to be considered a contender.

Agree0 Disagree0

Interesting that a season in the Premiership makes your little provincial club bigger than Leeds ! Dream on you didn't get bigger crowds than us when in the same league.

Agree0 Disagree0

And i think its a bit rich calling Leeds a dump coming from somebody from Norwich dont you think?

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm a Leeds fan and can say that there is 0% change that Paul Lambert would leave what he has now for us. Get real guys. Norwich fans - don't even feel the need to comment, it's pure fantasy. My only problem with Lambert is I can't understand a word he says.

Agree0 Disagree0

Norwich are just overachieving in the first place

Agree0 Disagree0

Paul Lambert to sign new 3and half year deal at Norwich this week, will announce before the weekend

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Feb 2012 07:38:19
Ive heard Warnock as the job, and he will appoint redfearn as his assistant

Believable26 Unbelievable18

09 Feb 2012 00:29:36
WARNOCK has the job. Has a few weeks to sort out a few more additional loan players and some haggling behing the scenes. Redfern just a puppet to buy time and allow a transition to take place.

Believable31 Unbelievable20

Sounds like you are making this up. Bates confirmed Redfearn will be in charge for next 3 games at least

Agree0 Disagree0

Redfearn no puppet. Could be next Leeds boss.

Agree0 Disagree0

Bates has sacked sg, given redfern AT LEAST in his words the next 3 games,this one of the easier run of games,so given redfern the biggest opportunity to do well,this is bates lying to us again,redfern will be in charge for the rest of the season unless we have a poor run in these games.

Agree0 Disagree0

Why is that lying? If anything Bates is being completely honest about the Redfearn situation. If he keeps winning he has as good a chance as anybody.

Agree0 Disagree0

Good luck to redfern, but i have a feeling no one will be appointed till delph as returned to villa.

This way bates will save a fair bit on wages and the new man will be told he as to work with the squad he as, Hope im wrong but bates as to pay grayson and his staff off something to me don't feel right.

Agree0 Disagree0

He is being economical with the truth as usual! we all know that Redfern will be in charge until end of season. Its the cheap option, he wont bother Bates by asking to bring any emergency loans in because he knows what Bates answer will be. Lets just go for it for rest of season, get behind the lads and forget about Bates. We support Leeds United not Bates. We are only 7 pts off 2nd place and still have to play West Ham and Southampton at home yet as well so all to play for

Agree0 Disagree0

Why do we need anybody in on an emergency loan anyway? Squad is big enough as it is.

Agree0 Disagree0

Again, how has he lied about anything. He knows that the next 3 games only total 2 weeks, giving him plenty of time to find the right person to appoint, whether that person would need to wait for compensation or not is besides the point. Bates has NOT lied about anything! Give your head a shake!

Agree0 Disagree0

I think Bates has been as up front as possible in the circumstances. It's insulting to Redfearn to claim that he is only there because he is cheap. If he is good enough - fine; being cheap would be a bonus. If he isn't fine I presume KB will bring in someone else but there is no guarantee they will do any better. Years ago I had reservations when O'leary was made up to manager but he did well -before the roof fell in. There is no reason why Redfearn cant do a good job also. KB has just kept his options open. Cheap doesn't necessarily mean bad and expensive doesn't always lead to success. Let's see what happens over the next few games.

Agree0 Disagree0

To be fair to bates, i think he has been quite honest with the fact redfearn will be in control for at least 3 games, probably to see what he can do - and if he can get leeds to pick up points like he did last weekend id be the first to back him as manager. Rather have someone inexperienced like redfearn who has the team winning than a big name who struggles. If it isnt broke - dont fix it.

Agree0 Disagree0

If Redfearn wins the next three games, I don't have any problem with him being in charge.

Agree0 Disagree0