Leeds Banter Archive December 17 2019

 

Use our rumours form to send us leeds transfer rumours.

17 Dec 2019 09:10:38
I wonder what happens to QSI money if we do not get promoted this year? All the talk is money now and a deal, subject to promotion, but I do not recollect a Plan B. What happens to the takeover if we are still a Championship team. Do they still buy, at a reduced fee, or walk away leaving a 10 mill investment (for the future? ) . Anybody know?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

17 Dec 2019 12:27:51
Reduced fee.

Agree1 Disagree0

17 Dec 2019 13:02:42
I have not read anything anywhere about any Plan B

If I were QSI I wouldn't be taking out my chequebook too soon. A loan of £10m whether we get promoted or not would seem to be of an advantage whatever the outcome.

If we are promoted it is a deposit towards the full value of club at PL value
If we aren't promoted they will probably be able to claim that money back against the forthcoming season ticket sales

From Leeds' point of view it will give the team a larger budget for the January transfer window.

At the present moment I could not say what, if any, incoming transfers there could be.
Yes, we are tight in terms of numbers but that's how Biesla likes it. My guess is that come midway through January the club with assess how any injuries are progressing and what personnel we are likely to have for Feb, Mar and April. Should they highlight likely weak areas it will be those that the transfer budget will be spent on

(The rumour of a link to Ayew seems a lot more plausible that the Dwight Gayle or Vydra one that follows us at each transfer window. Ayew has already played within the Biesla system so would not need the 6 week orientation that seems to be the norm for all our signings under Biesla
And bearing in mind that Nekeitha is now fully up to speed with the system I think it would be good advice if Ian Wright told his protege to finish the season with us and reap from the work he has done)

Agree1 Disagree0

17 Dec 2019 13:34:45
damn autocorrect seems to have erroneously inserted the word 'larger' got into your sentence above: "a larger budget for the January transfer window"

Agree1 Disagree0

17 Dec 2019 14:05:19
Think the deal from what is in the media is £120m if promoted and
£80m as a championship club . One theory on why Rads has not done the deal at this moment in time is,
if QSI had control they would be able to save themselves £40m on the purchase price by not achieving promotion this season.
The £10m is the deposit for the purchase, the amount of balancing payment is determined by which division we are in next season.
Rads is not prepared to allow QSI influence which Division we are in, so will keep the reins until this is known.

Agree2 Disagree0

17 Dec 2019 18:06:52
The rewards of promotion must be worth more than 40 mill per season.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Dec 2019 21:04:27
Just “SHOW ME THE MONEY! ”.

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Dec 2019 08:22:20
Canada: not all the money goes into the owners pockets though. A lot ‘should’ go into competing in the Premier league so in terms of value it doesn’t always add too much.

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Dec 2019 11:00:01
It's not about owners pockets with these guys. Satying in championship is almost certainly a financial hit (all clubs are losing money) . In PL the income is so high you can make or profit (or choose to invest in squad) .

Agree2 Disagree0

Review Of The Day 17th December 2019

17 Dec 2019 07:39:04
{Ed's Note - Ed001 has posted a new article entitled, Review Of The Day 17th December 2019

Believable0 Unbelievable0

17 Dec 2019 12:33:59
What a weird poster. What do you suppose it is supposed to mean. I can’t work it out at all. If it wasn’t for the text I wouldn’t guess what it was about.

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - it is ridiculous alf. Serie A just either don't understand racism or they are deliberately sticking 2 fingers up to anti-racism protestors.}

17 Dec 2019 13:35:25
it certainly seems like the latter.

Agree1 Disagree0

17 Dec 2019 16:38:23
That picture is disgusting. Is it a wind up or is it really authorised campaign material?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - genuinely what Serie A have released. Then they wonder why there is such a problem with racism in the Italian game.}

17 Dec 2019 17:05:11
Equivalent in sincerity, brainpower and trustworthiness as hiring a serial rapist to be the manager in charge of a women's shelter.

Agree2 Disagree0

17 Dec 2019 20:17:15
Utterly ridiculous! Who the feck marketing company came up with that!? Adolph and Mussolini and sons? Disgraceful.

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Dec 2019 12:36:07
The blame seems simply threefold. A marketing team of "experts" sat down and devized it, then a corporate team of Italian lawyers signed it off, then the Italian Football authorities accepted it. No one put his hand up and said "we may have a problem here". After all does non of them know the nature of the chants at many grounds?

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Dec 2019 21:39:50
Having read some articles about it, the artist felt that his pictures showed that we were all descended from monkeys, with a rather too subtle change in eye shape and colour, and skin colour within the painted lines supposedly illustrating Western on the left (top) , African in the middle and Eastern on the right (bottom) . The only way this concept could have been illustrated in a way that could at a push have been acceptable would to have (with the permission of the players in question) to have superimposed onto the three monkeys heads the faces either of three players of different races currently playing in Serie A, say Buffon, Koudibaly and Takehiro Tomiyasu or perhaps better would be three legends of Serie A - say Paulo Maldini, George Weah and Hidetoshi Nakata. Probably still not totally acceptable, but at least it conveys the message that we are all monkeys really rather more clearly than the pictures actually used.

Agree0 Disagree0