13 Jan 2017 19:29:16
Can our make shift defence and attacking formation deal with three up front?
Believable1
Unbelievable1
13 Jan 2017 21:30:37
85 mins and so far so good.
Agree2
Disagree0
13 Jan 2017 22:01:18
Just how good are we
Agree2
Disagree0
{Ed025's Note - very good boston...and its all down to monk mate..
13 Jan 2017 23:23:12
How good. we are leeds that says it all.
Agree1
Disagree0
13 Jan 2017 23:40:00
We are looking like a team I've not seen for years. Get in there. mot. I love it.
Agree1
Disagree0
13 Jan 2017 16:12:07
Bit of a Friday food for thought. Now I don't want to lose Taylor and I'm not sure Monk will let him leave on principal at this point if nothing else. That said, with us needing a ST and us rebuffing Borough's £7m bid, is there a case to be made for offering Taylor and £1m/£2m for Rhodes? We could also pick up Verboom who we looked at in the summer for around £2m. That gives us one of the best ST's in the league and replacement LB of similar pedigree (Belgian youth international) for between £3m and £4m. Surely a cracking bit of business if went for it?
Believable2
Unbelievable3
13 Jan 2017 18:56:35
Agree with u gummie. unless Taylor signs a new contract just get the cash while we can.
Agree1
Disagree1
13 Jan 2017 21:49:37
yeh but is Verboom good enough. I mean will he hit the ground running. Taylor was back on form before injury but i must admit i like the idea of Rhodes for Leeds as the lad can score. Then again be hard to drop Wood?
Agree0
Disagree0
13 Jan 2017 21:52:48
Think we've proved tonight we don't need the suit maker. We would miss his attacking runs down the side lines but can't turn down £7m plus
Agree2
Disagree2
13 Jan 2017 22:19:53
I was dithering but now I think, take the 8-10mil for Taylor and invest it where necessary, but only with Quality. We are not desperate. We already have more than competent back on our books.
Agree0
Disagree0