Leeds Rumours Archive March 18 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us leeds transfer rumours.

18 Mar 2014 20:09:58
Just been talking to a mate of mine who is the manager of a corals bookmakers, and leeds have been removed from the betting for relegation. Strong indication of a 10 point deduction coming.

Not what we want to hear!

Lifelongleedsfan

Believable21 Unbelievable84

This is NOT true !

You can quote me on this .
Leeds utd with Corals were 150/1 for relegation
as off today 18/3/2014 330pm
Corals are offering Leeds Utd to be relegated at . 12/1
this is FACT!!!

Agree4 Disagree0

No chance of the ten point deduction gfh won't allow it cause they will lose to much money

Agree1 Disagree0

There's only 9 games left ffs, we won't go down!

Agree1 Disagree1

This is total rubbish. The post doesn't make sense!?

If we were docked 10 points we would be 2 points clear of drip (was when you posted yesterday), we why would they suspend the betting? This would just be all the more reason to put us in the relegation betting and shorten our odds!

The only way they would suspend is if we were 15 points a drift or in the playoffs! Not a very well thought out rumour as you've got it wrapped right round your neck.

Agree2 Disagree0

Lifelongleedsfan, are you Andy Flowers Goes Pop in disguise causing a little bit of mischief?

Agree1 Disagree0

Just a minor thing but 10 games left. We won't go down!
The squad has been under performing but the threat of relegation would spur enough into action to keep clear. That is what happened last season!

Agree3 Disagree1

19 Mar 2014 12:20:28
Who put the bookies in charge of the league or Leeds Utd? Total nonsense.

Agree1 Disagree0

Rubbish. if we go into admin then the 10pt deduction won't take effect until next season now.

Agree0 Disagree0

Looked into the rules and I think that if we go into administration before the end of March then we are deducted 10 points straight away. If its after that date then the penalty is carried over to the next season unless the club avoids relegation in which case it is taken off this seasons total.

Agree0 Disagree0

Wouldn't bet against GFH cocking up and putting us in administration before that deadline

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Mar 2014 17:45:24
Cellino is filing an appeal. Cellino's lawyer Professor Cocco told tv Radio Leeds that the appeal against the tax evasion verdict could take between six and nine months. That would be a disaster for us.

Believable24 Unbelievable7

Massimo could relinquish his shares in eleonora which he could have done to start with but he believed he would win the case. However he is already a minority shareholder so could challenge the whole fit and proper process
BIGE

Agree2 Disagree0

Professor Cocco . You've got to love it :D

Agree4 Disagree0

Eleonora sports have to prove where there money is coming from. From what your saying Eleonora could be financed by a massive donation from a Colombian drug lord but that is fine as he isn't on the board so that money isn't dirty and Eleonora are free to proceed and buy us with drug money. If it was as simple as him relinquishing his shares don't you think he would have done that already.

Agree0 Disagree0

In Italy there are three stages in court Massimo Cellino has now taken the 3rd stage that is to appeal this now means in Italian law he is innocent until that court date. His solicitor has also spoken of the 3 stage system in Italy. Below is a good post from Ka01 from another site so let's hope its not all doom and gloom just yet.

I believe Massimo Cellino has been done for "Accounting Fraud".
That's a joke, the EU accounts aren't signed off most years because of fraud in EU departments. They get away with accounting fraud on a grand scale!

By the way not all convictions lead to automatic disqualification as the media seem to want us to think.
There is a clause that convictions that don't fall within certain categories and don't attract jail sentence 1 year or more will not lead to disqualification. That clause has to be there or people convicted of minor crimes like minor traffic offences would be disqualified.
Tax evasion is not a minor crime of course but has he been convicted of that or "Accounting Fraud".
Just an interpretation to show why FL not jumping to conclusions like some of the media haven't been able to resist!
"Accounting Fraud" could mean that they have decided he switched the ownership of the boat to the Company without any justification for doing so and possibly without the Company paying any consideration for receiving the yacht. Doing that legally would not be tax evasion but tax avoidance which is legal.
Perhaps by saying "Accounting Fraud" rather than tax evasion the Court has made it necessary for the FL to check its position. Who commits an "Accounting Fraud"? The client or the Accountant? Perhaps Cellino should sue his Accountant?!
There is also the question that under Italian law if Cellino appeals he is not guilty until the appeal case is settled. As Shaun Harvey said in bhis letter to the MP, someone is innocent until proven guilty and the rules do say pending cases are not a reason for disqualification .
I am not saying who is right and who is wrong but just pointing out that despite the ruling in the Italian court it is not all as clear cut as some would have us believe!

Believable33 Unbelievable6

Thats a very good explanation, well done. Where I disagree slightly is that the criteria of "convictions of dishonesty" within the f and p test which is helpfully vague from the FL's prospective. I feel sure they will use this as reason to turn cellino down sad to say, . hope I'm wrong.

Agree1 Disagree0

18 Mar 2014 19:36:04
Good post mate, I feel we've still got hope after some of them points raised!

Agree2 Disagree1

Good post, you wonder why the likes of YEP doesn't raise these kind of points, i.e the ways of Italian law which to be fair is perhaps a rule unto itself.

Agree2 Disagree0

YENGO
Well put makes interesting reading tks.
Just wondering how did Yeung (Birmingham)
get FL clearance with his court case pending for years the found guilty?
Ambramovic (Chelski) don't know how true it is but he supposed to be up for money laundering etc with his gas company in Russia before he bought the club.

Maybe the FA do have it in for us ;(

Andy MOT

Agree1 Disagree0

18 Mar 2014 09:03:36
Just been o Radio Leeds that Cellino has been fined 600,000 euros and his yacht conficated for tax evasion.

Where does that put us now??

Right in the rubbish!

Believable39 Unbelievable5

Up the administration river without a boat.

Agree1 Disagree1

This is bad news but let's wait to hear what the fl say, and iff they say no then surely gfh will have to sell to someone else?

Agree1 Disagree0

18 Mar 2014 10:19:17
The current developments will probably rule out Cellino from aquiring more than a 29% shareholding in LUFC. Assuming that a 75% share is worth £25m and as he has already invested circa £6m, GFH can exchange that for shares and he could still invest arround another £2m.

Clearly GFH don't have mony to continue funding, so this would be a sensible temporary solution until either Cellino clears his name or another bidder comes in and invests say £12m for GFH's 50% or hopefully buys them all out with a 100% bid

Agree4 Disagree1

It's ok saying sell to someone else but that someone else now has the loan from cellino and whoever else gfh borrowed off since Jan, also it's going to take weeks to conclude any deal, and they have wages to pay this month.

Agree1 Disagree0

This the end of football, as we know it Jim! Beam us down!

Agree0 Disagree0

Understand what you mean about selling to someone else and they will have the debt, but won't any other bidder be in a position to offer a reduced price to buy us or doesn't it work like that?

Agree1 Disagree0

As far as I was aware Mr Cellino is not buying Leeds Utd, Eleonora Sports are purchasing LUFC, which Mr Cellino owns 10% of.So that would make Mr Cellino's conviction today immaterial in the FL fit and proper test, unless they could prove he owned more then 10% of Eleonora Sports, which in itself would I think disqualify him /Eleonora Sports from purchasing 75% of LUFC, so keep the faith.MOT

Agree3 Disagree0

This statement from FL is on Newsnow "A Football League spokesman said: "The Football League has noted the outcome of the Court hearing earlier today regarding Massimo Cellino.

"We are engaged in an ongoing dialogue with his legal representatives in this country and cannot comment further at this time."

Agree1 Disagree0

Think its fairly easy to prove that Cellino is the owner and major financier of Eleonora Sports as well as being chairman so it does make a difference to the FA's fit and proper test if Cellino has been found guilty

Agree1 Disagree1

If he pays the fine straight away will it be considered spent by the FL straight Way?

Agree0 Disagree1

To the last poster who says it is fairly easy to prove Mr Cellino is the financier and head of Eleonora Sports, what do you base this FACT on?A laymans explanation will do me, as I was of the opinion Mr Cellino was a successful business man, so your saying that success is based on him making up transparent companies to cover his tracks?Which in your opinion will be brought to light by the Football league?I do not feel they are asking him to prove he owns Eleonora Sports as they would have mentioned this already

Agree0 Disagree1

A spent conviction is considered such I think after five years? of its handing down from a court anywhere in the world in keeping with the rehab of offenders act. Given the nature of the conviction ( tax evasion) this will be construed as a conviction for 'dishonesty' as per the cpp test and will therefore be barred from taking up ownership at LUFC, i'm sure much to the delight of the FL board.

Agree2 Disagree0

18 Mar 2014 16:15:39
Just adding to first reply - and our life raft is being captained by publicity David haigh!

Agree1 Disagree0

Just what the league were hoping for, bet s harvey and his g and t drinkers are having a party and getting p****d as we speak. As soon as they've sobbered up they'll annouce mr cellino has failed the fit and propper person test due to his recent conviction

Agree1 Disagree0

18 Mar 2014 16:40:23
latest on the football league website

http://www.football-league.co.uk/footballleaguenews/20140318/football-league-statement-leeds-united_2293334_3719289

Doesnt look good IMO

lifelongleedsfan

Agree1 Disagree0

One of the darkest days in the history of our great club. Lost for words, absolutely fuming.

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Mar 2014 17:14:26
In Italy there are three stages in court Massimo Cellino has now taken the 3rd stage that is to appeal this now means in Italian law he is innocent until that court date. His solicitor has also spoken of the 3 stage system in Italy. Below is a good post from Ka01 from another site so let's hope its not all doom and gloom just yet.

I believe Massimo Cellino has been done for "Accounting Fraud".
That's a joke, the EU accounts aren't signed off most years because of fraud in EU departments. They get away with accounting fraud on a grand scale!

By the way not all convictions lead to automatic disqualification as the media seem to want us to think.
There is a clause that convictions that don't fall within certain categories and don't attract jail sentence 1 year or more will not lead to disqualification. That clause has to be there or people convicted of minor crimes like minor traffic offences would be disqualified.
Tax evasion is not a minor crime of course but has he been convicted of that or "Accounting Fraud".
Just an interpretation to show why FL not jumping to conclusions like some of the media haven't been able to resist!
"Accounting Fraud" could mean that they have decided he switched the ownership of the boat to the Company without any justification for doing so and possibly without the Company paying any consideration for receiving the yacht. Doing that legally would not be tax evasion but tax avoidance which is legal.
Perhaps by saying "Accounting Fraud" rather than tax evasion the Court has made it necessary for the FL to check its position. Who commits an "Accounting Fraud"? The client or the Accountant? Perhaps Cellino should sue his Accountant?!
There is also the question that under Italian law if Cellino appeals he is not guilty until the appeal case is settled. As Shaun Harvey said in bhis letter to the MP, someone is innocent until proven guilty and the rules do say pending cases are not a reason for disqualification .
I am not saying who is right and who is wrong but just pointing out that despite the ruling in the Italian court it is not all as clear cut as some would have us believe!

Agree0 Disagree0

We will be back on the market looking for a new owner.

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Mar 2014 19:24:02
It doesn't mean anything that Cellino owns less than 10% of Eleanora. It is clearly his outfit. He has been found guilty, even if he is able to appeal. There is no point whining, GFC created this situation. I think Cellino could be good for Leeds, but he is trouble. We'd be laughing if this was happening to another club, and mocking them for being so stupid. We can only hope for a good, quick outcome. I think the worst is that we'd have to write off next season too.

Agree0 Disagree0

Does anyone else think we may have to leave Elland Road if we don't get a takeover? Obviously the rent is killing us and we will struggle to pay it without investment. Worse case scenario obviously, and I'm hope I'm wrong, but just worried.

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Mar 2014 08:48:04
Prospective Leeds United owner Massimo Cellino has been found guilty of tax evasion in an Italian court.

He plans to appeal.

Believable24 Unbelievable6

Game over. RIP LUFC

Agree0 Disagree1

Yes i've just read it as well. He's been fined 600,000 euros.

Agree1 Disagree0

He's not in court until 11:00 d'oh!

Agree0 Disagree6

From what I've read, the rule from the FA says only unspent convictions should be taken into consideration.

Word from italian press is that Cellino's been fined and had his yacht taken. In my eyes this means he has served his punishment (payed a fine and lost his boat) so should it therefore not be considered as spent?

Just a thought.

Agree2 Disagree1

I think we should look elsewhere i'm sure someone out there can see our clubs potential

Agree1 Disagree0

Found 600,000 euros. You couldn't make it up . I think that has to be him out of the game. Even if the appeal is ultimately successful the timescales will be all wrong. Presumably a fire sale of the club by GFH now follows. Likely outcomes: administration, another skint consortium God help us or - let's dream - someone very wealthy who (a) gets it and (b) is less of a flake than Cellino.

Agree1 Disagree0

Look on there news and not see any think on there

Agree0 Disagree1

He has been fined and had his boat taken off him that means it is spent so really its a slap on the wrists no prison convictions no you are not allowed to run a company so our corrupt football league who have probably done a lot worse can not find any reason not to allow him to take charge of us.

Agree1 Disagree1

18 Mar 2014 12:11:35
Some wishful thinking on here about definition of his conviction being spent simply because he pays the fine and loses the yacht. A conviction is classed as spent after the passing of so many years (not sure how many but would guess at between 3 - 6) so this latest conviction is clearly not spent.

Agree1 Disagree0

Taking the fine doesn't mean that the conviction is spent its jist his punishment, itll b spent after x amount of years

Agree1 Disagree0

Does that mean the T.O is over for Cellino? I'm confused!
What next?
Who next?
When next?
Administration again!?
League One here we come!
Oh so much wanted to play against
Man U in the championship!!

Agree0 Disagree0

Conviction not spent, I got a fine for speeding but I still had to disclose that to the insurance companies for 5 years. The fine is just a slightly less severe punishment than sending him to jail. He will still have to declare the conviction for x number of years (I don't know how many italian law asks for)

Agree0 Disagree0

A spent conviction is one that is 10 years old not 10 minutes. He also has another case pending. Welcome back Mr Flower. Your offer will be acceted now. No more crooks at Leeds please

Agree0 Disagree0