Leeds Rumours Archive March 18 2014
Use our rumours form to send us leeds transfer rumours.
18 Mar 2014 20:09:58
Just been talking to a mate of mine who is the manager of a corals bookmakers, and leeds have been removed from the betting for relegation. Strong indication of a 10 point deduction coming.
Not what we want to hear!
Lifelongleedsfan
Believable21
Unbelievable84
This is NOT true !
You can quote me on this .
Leeds utd with Corals were 150/1 for relegation
as off today 18/3/2014 330pm
Corals are offering Leeds Utd to be relegated at . 12/1
this is FACT!!!
Agree4
Disagree0
No chance of the ten point deduction gfh won't allow it cause they will lose to much money
Agree1
Disagree0
There's only 9 games left ffs, we won't go down!
Agree1
Disagree1
This is total rubbish. The post doesn't make sense!?
If we were docked 10 points we would be 2 points clear of drip (was when you posted yesterday), we why would they suspend the betting? This would just be all the more reason to put us in the relegation betting and shorten our odds!
The only way they would suspend is if we were 15 points a drift or in the playoffs! Not a very well thought out rumour as you've got it wrapped right round your neck.
Agree2
Disagree0
Lifelongleedsfan, are you Andy Flowers Goes Pop in disguise causing a little bit of mischief?
Agree1
Disagree0
Just a minor thing but 10 games left. We won't go down!
The squad has been under performing but the threat of relegation would spur enough into action to keep clear. That is what happened last season!
Agree3
Disagree1
19 Mar 2014 12:20:28
Who put the bookies in charge of the league or Leeds Utd? Total nonsense.
Agree1
Disagree0
Rubbish. if we go into admin then the 10pt deduction won't take effect until next season now.
Agree0
Disagree0
Looked into the rules and I think that if we go into administration before the end of March then we are deducted 10 points straight away. If its after that date then the penalty is carried over to the next season unless the club avoids relegation in which case it is taken off this seasons total.
Agree0
Disagree0
Wouldn't bet against GFH cocking up and putting us in administration before that deadline
Agree0
Disagree0
18 Mar 2014 17:45:24
Cellino is filing an appeal. Cellino's lawyer Professor Cocco told tv Radio Leeds that the appeal against the tax evasion verdict could take between six and nine months. That would be a disaster for us.
Believable24
Unbelievable7
Massimo could relinquish his shares in eleonora which he could have done to start with but he believed he would win the case. However he is already a minority shareholder so could challenge the whole fit and proper process
BIGE
Agree2
Disagree0
Professor Cocco . You've got to love it :D
Agree4
Disagree0
Eleonora sports have to prove where there money is coming from. From what your saying Eleonora could be financed by a massive donation from a Colombian drug lord but that is fine as he isn't on the board so that money isn't dirty and Eleonora are free to proceed and buy us with drug money. If it was as simple as him relinquishing his shares don't you think he would have done that already.
Agree0
Disagree0
In Italy there are three stages in court Massimo Cellino has now taken the 3rd stage that is to appeal this now means in Italian law he is innocent until that court date. His solicitor has also spoken of the 3 stage system in Italy. Below is a good post from Ka01 from another site so let's hope its not all doom and gloom just yet.
I believe Massimo Cellino has been done for "Accounting Fraud".
That's a joke, the EU accounts aren't signed off most years because of fraud in EU departments. They get away with accounting fraud on a grand scale!
By the way not all convictions lead to automatic disqualification as the media seem to want us to think.
There is a clause that convictions that don't fall within certain categories and don't attract jail sentence 1 year or more will not lead to disqualification. That clause has to be there or people convicted of minor crimes like minor traffic offences would be disqualified.
Tax evasion is not a minor crime of course but has he been convicted of that or "Accounting Fraud".
Just an interpretation to show why FL not jumping to conclusions like some of the media haven't been able to resist!
"Accounting Fraud" could mean that they have decided he switched the ownership of the boat to the Company without any justification for doing so and possibly without the Company paying any consideration for receiving the yacht. Doing that legally would not be tax evasion but tax avoidance which is legal.
Perhaps by saying "Accounting Fraud" rather than tax evasion the Court has made it necessary for the FL to check its position. Who commits an "Accounting Fraud"? The client or the Accountant? Perhaps Cellino should sue his Accountant?!
There is also the question that under Italian law if Cellino appeals he is not guilty until the appeal case is settled. As Shaun Harvey said in bhis letter to the MP, someone is innocent until proven guilty and the rules do say pending cases are not a reason for disqualification .
I am not saying who is right and who is wrong but just pointing out that despite the ruling in the Italian court it is not all as clear cut as some would have us believe!
Believable33
Unbelievable6
Thats a very good explanation, well done. Where I disagree slightly is that the criteria of "convictions of dishonesty" within the f and p test which is helpfully vague from the FL's prospective. I feel sure they will use this as reason to turn cellino down sad to say, . hope I'm wrong.
Agree1
Disagree0
18 Mar 2014 19:36:04
Good post mate, I feel we've still got hope after some of them points raised!
Agree2
Disagree1
Good post, you wonder why the likes of YEP doesn't raise these kind of points, i.e the ways of Italian law which to be fair is perhaps a rule unto itself.
Agree2
Disagree0
YENGO
Well put makes interesting reading tks.
Just wondering how did Yeung (Birmingham)
get FL clearance with his court case pending for years the found guilty?
Ambramovic (Chelski) don't know how true it is but he supposed to be up for money laundering etc with his gas company in Russia before he bought the club.
Maybe the FA do have it in for us ;(
Andy MOT
Agree1
Disagree0
18 Mar 2014 09:03:36
Just been o Radio Leeds that Cellino has been fined 600,000 euros and his yacht conficated for tax evasion.
Where does that put us now??
Right in the rubbish!
Believable39
Unbelievable5
Up the administration river without a boat.
Agree1
Disagree1
This is bad news but let's wait to hear what the fl say, and iff they say no then surely gfh will have to sell to someone else?
Agree1
Disagree0
18 Mar 2014 10:19:17
The current developments will probably rule out Cellino from aquiring more than a 29% shareholding in LUFC. Assuming that a 75% share is worth £25m and as he has already invested circa £6m, GFH can exchange that for shares and he could still invest arround another £2m.
Clearly GFH don't have mony to continue funding, so this would be a sensible temporary solution until either Cellino clears his name or another bidder comes in and invests say £12m for GFH's 50% or hopefully buys them all out with a 100% bid
Agree4
Disagree1
It's ok saying sell to someone else but that someone else now has the loan from cellino and whoever else gfh borrowed off since Jan, also it's going to take weeks to conclude any deal, and they have wages to pay this month.
Agree1
Disagree0
This the end of football, as we know it Jim! Beam us down!
Agree0
Disagree0
Understand what you mean about selling to someone else and they will have the debt, but won't any other bidder be in a position to offer a reduced price to buy us or doesn't it work like that?
Agree1
Disagree0
As far as I was aware Mr Cellino is not buying Leeds Utd, Eleonora Sports are purchasing LUFC, which Mr Cellino owns 10% of.So that would make Mr Cellino's conviction today immaterial in the FL fit and proper test, unless they could prove he owned more then 10% of Eleonora Sports, which in itself would I think disqualify him /Eleonora Sports from purchasing 75% of LUFC, so keep the faith.MOT
Agree3
Disagree0
This statement from FL is on Newsnow "A Football League spokesman said: "The Football League has noted the outcome of the Court hearing earlier today regarding Massimo Cellino.
"We are engaged in an ongoing dialogue with his legal representatives in this country and cannot comment further at this time."
Agree1
Disagree0
Think its fairly easy to prove that Cellino is the owner and major financier of Eleonora Sports as well as being chairman so it does make a difference to the FA's fit and proper test if Cellino has been found guilty
Agree1
Disagree1
If he pays the fine straight away will it be considered spent by the FL straight Way?
Agree0
Disagree1
To the last poster who says it is fairly easy to prove Mr Cellino is the financier and head of Eleonora Sports, what do you base this FACT on?A laymans explanation will do me, as I was of the opinion Mr Cellino was a successful business man, so your saying that success is based on him making up transparent companies to cover his tracks?Which in your opinion will be brought to light by the Football league?I do not feel they are asking him to prove he owns Eleonora Sports as they would have mentioned this already
Agree0
Disagree1
A spent conviction is considered such I think after five years? of its handing down from a court anywhere in the world in keeping with the rehab of offenders act. Given the nature of the conviction ( tax evasion) this will be construed as a conviction for 'dishonesty' as per the cpp test and will therefore be barred from taking up ownership at LUFC, i'm sure much to the delight of the FL board.
Agree2
Disagree0
18 Mar 2014 16:15:39
Just adding to first reply - and our life raft is being captained by publicity David haigh!
Agree1
Disagree0
Just what the league were hoping for, bet s harvey and his g and t drinkers are having a party and getting p****d as we speak. As soon as they've sobbered up they'll annouce mr cellino has failed the fit and propper person test due to his recent conviction
Agree1
Disagree0
18 Mar 2014 16:40:23
latest on the football league website
http://www.football-league.co.uk/footballleaguenews/20140318/football-league-statement-leeds-united_2293334_3719289
Doesnt look good IMO
lifelongleedsfan
Agree1
Disagree0
One of the darkest days in the history of our great club. Lost for words, absolutely fuming.
Agree0
Disagree0
18 Mar 2014 17:14:26
In Italy there are three stages in court Massimo Cellino has now taken the 3rd stage that is to appeal this now means in Italian law he is innocent until that court date. His solicitor has also spoken of the 3 stage system in Italy. Below is a good post from Ka01 from another site so let's hope its not all doom and gloom just yet.
I believe Massimo Cellino has been done for "Accounting Fraud".
That's a joke, the EU accounts aren't signed off most years because of fraud in EU departments. They get away with accounting fraud on a grand scale!
By the way not all convictions lead to automatic disqualification as the media seem to want us to think.
There is a clause that convictions that don't fall within certain categories and don't attract jail sentence 1 year or more will not lead to disqualification. That clause has to be there or people convicted of minor crimes like minor traffic offences would be disqualified.
Tax evasion is not a minor crime of course but has he been convicted of that or "Accounting Fraud".
Just an interpretation to show why FL not jumping to conclusions like some of the media haven't been able to resist!
"Accounting Fraud" could mean that they have decided he switched the ownership of the boat to the Company without any justification for doing so and possibly without the Company paying any consideration for receiving the yacht. Doing that legally would not be tax evasion but tax avoidance which is legal.
Perhaps by saying "Accounting Fraud" rather than tax evasion the Court has made it necessary for the FL to check its position. Who commits an "Accounting Fraud"? The client or the Accountant? Perhaps Cellino should sue his Accountant?!
There is also the question that under Italian law if Cellino appeals he is not guilty until the appeal case is settled. As Shaun Harvey said in bhis letter to the MP, someone is innocent until proven guilty and the rules do say pending cases are not a reason for disqualification .
I am not saying who is right and who is wrong but just pointing out that despite the ruling in the Italian court it is not all as clear cut as some would have us believe!
Agree0
Disagree0
We will be back on the market looking for a new owner.
Agree0
Disagree0
18 Mar 2014 19:24:02
It doesn't mean anything that Cellino owns less than 10% of Eleanora. It is clearly his outfit. He has been found guilty, even if he is able to appeal. There is no point whining, GFC created this situation. I think Cellino could be good for Leeds, but he is trouble. We'd be laughing if this was happening to another club, and mocking them for being so stupid. We can only hope for a good, quick outcome. I think the worst is that we'd have to write off next season too.
Agree0
Disagree0
Does anyone else think we may have to leave Elland Road if we don't get a takeover? Obviously the rent is killing us and we will struggle to pay it without investment. Worse case scenario obviously, and I'm hope I'm wrong, but just worried.
Agree0
Disagree0
18 Mar 2014 08:48:04
Prospective Leeds United owner Massimo Cellino has been found guilty of tax evasion in an Italian court.
He plans to appeal.
Believable24
Unbelievable6
Game over. RIP LUFC
Agree0
Disagree1
Yes i've just read it as well. He's been fined 600,000 euros.
Agree1
Disagree0
He's not in court until 11:00 d'oh!
Agree0
Disagree6
From what I've read, the rule from the FA says only unspent convictions should be taken into consideration.
Word from italian press is that Cellino's been fined and had his yacht taken. In my eyes this means he has served his punishment (payed a fine and lost his boat) so should it therefore not be considered as spent?
Just a thought.
Agree2
Disagree1
I think we should look elsewhere i'm sure someone out there can see our clubs potential
Agree1
Disagree0
Found 600,000 euros. You couldn't make it up . I think that has to be him out of the game. Even if the appeal is ultimately successful the timescales will be all wrong. Presumably a fire sale of the club by GFH now follows. Likely outcomes: administration, another skint consortium God help us or - let's dream - someone very wealthy who (a) gets it and (b) is less of a flake than Cellino.
Agree1
Disagree0
Look on there news and not see any think on there
Agree0
Disagree1
He has been fined and had his boat taken off him that means it is spent so really its a slap on the wrists no prison convictions no you are not allowed to run a company so our corrupt football league who have probably done a lot worse can not find any reason not to allow him to take charge of us.
Agree1
Disagree1
18 Mar 2014 12:11:35
Some wishful thinking on here about definition of his conviction being spent simply because he pays the fine and loses the yacht. A conviction is classed as spent after the passing of so many years (not sure how many but would guess at between 3 - 6) so this latest conviction is clearly not spent.
Agree1
Disagree0
Taking the fine doesn't mean that the conviction is spent its jist his punishment, itll b spent after x amount of years
Agree1
Disagree0
Does that mean the T.O is over for Cellino? I'm confused!
What next?
Who next?
When next?
Administration again!?
League One here we come!
Oh so much wanted to play against
Man U in the championship!!
Agree0
Disagree0
Conviction not spent, I got a fine for speeding but I still had to disclose that to the insurance companies for 5 years. The fine is just a slightly less severe punishment than sending him to jail. He will still have to declare the conviction for x number of years (I don't know how many italian law asks for)
Agree0
Disagree0
A spent conviction is one that is 10 years old not 10 minutes. He also has another case pending. Welcome back Mr Flower. Your offer will be acceted now. No more crooks at Leeds please
Agree0
Disagree0