Leeds Rumours Member Posts

andy.powell's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To andy.powell's Posts

To andy.powell's last 5 banter posts

andy.powell has no Rumours Posts

andy.powell's banter posts with other poster's replies to andy.powell's banter posts

25 Mar 2014 11:06:53
Please take time to read

Yesterday’s Football League decision to block Massimo Cellino’s bid for Leeds United still reverberates around the football world – and appears set fair to make a proper old impact in the bewigged legal environment also. An appeal is inevitable and m’learned friends will be getting their fangs into the meat of the matter, dissecting the terminology of the rules in question (the Owners and Directors test) and entering into interminable semantic debates in an effort to prove white is black and “this” actually means “that”.

Therein, to this blog’s mind, lies the real problem. For, in their eagerness to show the technical application of their regulations to the instant case, the League have failed to pay any attention to common sense, practical considerations and real world consequences. In short they have done what they have leant over backwards to convince themselves they technically can – without anything like enough thought given as to whether they should.

This much is absolutely clear from a reading of their judgement, a not particularly accessible document which is redolent of some player in a game of strategy, anticipating the moves from the other side and exclaiming “a-HA!” as they trump that ace with some wily move of their own. It all looks rather clever, perhaps, but it’s not at all wise – not in the real world. Out there, real people are stuck with the consequences of these endgame machinations from remote, aloof players whose primary concern seems to be showing that they are technically right and that their view should therefore prevail.

The old saying “Just because you can, it doesn’t mean you should” has absolute relevance here. And before anyone decries old sayings, let’s not forget that they become old sayings because of their simplicity and impact, because of the sheer, concise, logical beauty of their common sense and reason. Not for them the contortions and convolutions of legalese, the twisting and turning to try and make a default position appear technically unimpeachable. Cleverness is all about winning in a head-to-head battle of cat and mouse, or in the strategy of chess. Wisdom, on the other hand, is about finding the right solution for the greater good – meeting the interests of the many, not just showing how one ego or the other has succeeded in “proving their position is legally correct”. What we have here, in a nutshell, is the distinction between law and justice. The League have strained every sinew to justify themselves in terms of the former, with scant if any regard for the latter.

In all the acres of print I read yesterday, there was far, far too much about interpretations of law and regulations – and hardly anything about the practical impact on the people who matter – the fans and, by association, Leeds United football club and its employees. The League, after a farcical delay during which everybody with any interest in the matter suffered pain and humiliation to an uncalled-for degree, appeared to have ended up justifying what must have been their default position from the start. Where was the recognition that here was a famous old club that had been in financial difficulty for over a decade, and now had the chance of a fresh start? Where was the consideration of the impact of this decision on thousands upon thousands of people for whom their football club represents a massive emotional and – for the individuals concerned – financial investment?

These real-world issues just weren’t there at all. It was all dry as dust; here are the legal reasons why the bid fails. But what do the League imagine Cellino will actually do, if he was accepted as Leeds owner? Buy another yacht, perhaps, and display it in the West Stand car park with a sign on it saying “No tax paid on this – b******* to the authorities”. Or perhaps he’d buy the stadium back, fund the club and get them promoted and competitive in a higher division under separate jurisdiction. Maybe that’s what they’re scared of.

What is needed here, what was totally absent yesterday, is a measure of wisdom. The Wisdom of Solomon, perhaps – that classical example of the magical compromise solution. Compromise requires give and take, negotiation, the willingness to apply common sense to a situation too fraught with humanity for the application of mere, prosaic regulations alone. But the League have neglected any such avenue of common sense or compromise. In reaching a decision to disbar Cellino because they feel they technically can, without sufficient or any regard for whether they really should, they have ended up throwing that Solomon baby out with the bathwater – and achieving an outcome which threatens to fly in the face of their own duty of care where their member clubs are concerned. Remember that duty of care, gentlemen?

And what do we actually have here, after all? Well, we have a man in Cellino who has made a considerable fortune in his working life – somebody who, as with anyone in that position, will have trodden on toes and made enemies as he rose to the top. That’s hardly unusual, as some of those Football League mandarins will be all too well aware. There are not too many squeaky-clean billionaires out there; omelettes are not made without eggs being broken at some point in the process. ”Let him who is without sin cast the first stone”, said a wise man once upon a time. That was another old saw that went missing yesterday. So we have this Italian guy, loaded with money, wanting to invest in an ailing football club – and he’s demonstrated his bona fides already to the extent of funding that club to a significant degree – without even being recognised as owner. The Football League need their member clubs to be financially viable. It is a vital part of the whole thing working. They should have been crawling on their hands and knees to thank Signor Cellino. So what do they actually do? They reject him, because one interpretation of a complex form of words says they can. Is that wisdom? No it’s not, it’s foolhardy, cack-handed incompetence. Or even worse, it might be prejudice and self-interest. Whatever it is, it’s not common sense.

The fans have admittedly been divided over Cellino, much more so than over certain unsavoury faces from the recent past. Ken Bates, for instance, was regarded as the Devil incarnate by most Leeds fans – and it’s clear from all sorts of evidence and his own personal demeanour that Mr Bates is a deeply unpleasant, profoundly dodgy individual. The fans knew that, and they agitated accordingly, to get him out of the club. The League merely sat on their hands and watched Leeds limp along in poverty and humiliation. And yet, on the other hand, they rule out of court a man that most Leeds fans do want to see at least given a chance – mainly because he represents the best hope of a properly-funded future for a club of history, pedigree and achievement. The blind arrogance of the refusal to afford that chance, the sheer self-defeating stubborn illogicality of it – it’s utterly mind-boggling. The moral is: the fans know best, instinctively, about their own club.

This process still evidently has a way to run – so maybe it’s not too late for the whole rationale behind it to change, and for the better. So let’s not get caught up in the esoteric interpretations of complex regulations – let’s have a little common sense. Let’s not end up with an outcome which will leave the Football League open to charges of failure in its duty towards a member of its own “football family” as that smug article Brian Mawhinney put it so unctuously on several occasions – let’s have impartiality and some pragmatism. The League, though, have form for coshing Leeds United over the head, allegedly in United’s own best interests. They keep feeding us this nasty medicine, saying it’ll do us good – when in reality the appearance is of a draught of poison that might carry us off. We’ve seen it all before – and the fact that we survived in 2007 is no fault of the Football League’s.

So please – let’s have some wisdom and common sense now, instead of dry law and rough justice. There are people out here, gentlemen of the League, people who will genuinely suffer if you carry on in your insistence on disappearing up your own fundament to justify decisions that damage the interests of a struggling football club. Leeds United matters – it matters far more than any legal principle or set of regulations allegedly drawn up to “protect” League members. If the League can’t see that for themselves, then somebody with a bit of common sense and clout needs to enter the process, even at this advanced stage.

Solomon the Wise is sadly not available – so who will step forward and provide the wisdom and insight this farcical situation so sorely needs? It’s sincerely to be hoped that the next few weeks will provide an answer to that.

1.) Cracking post Andy.

2.) That was good hope the persons at the fl read it

3.) A good if somewhat biblical read Andy P.

The duty of care the FL owes us does indeed seem at odds with their decision in our current situation, I mean what would Cellino do against Leeds Utd? He has kept a team in Seria A for many years and knows football and has cash (this is important, owners must have cash and when GFH bought us it is clear they didn't). An independent review (not the FL)of an appeal will give us a good chance to ensure that a duty of care is being carried out and no bias against Leeds, which on the outside looking in, seems to have happened here, i.e. no other takeover has gone on so long with so much comment. Now this may be all for a good reason, may be Leeds fault, but it does smell a little off, just a gut feel.

So an appeal here we come, just make it quick.

DG the Voice of reason?

4.) We all know we aren't going to get anything 'right' or 'fair' from the FL while they allow people like Harvey, Oyston and other Championship managers to judge on us.

It should be done by an independent group who have nothing to lose or gain whether the bid is passed OR NOT.

Until that happens we will NEVER be treated fairly by the FL.

Leeds4alongtime.

5.) Yet another pipe dreamer who thinks that money rules! What you and other misguided kangaroos need to understand there is the word STANDARDS
Genuine long term supporters at this club are fed up with the two faced devious B. s of which we have had our fill – Fotherby, Ridsdale, Kramer and the worst of all Bates
We would rather go down a league and end up with someone who actually cares for this great club and will invest and stick with us until success is achieved –look at Huddersfield as an example

6.) Well said Andy, ED. is there any way to send this directly to someone of importance at the FL, not to the general main adderss. It sums up all our frustrations exactly. Then get a copy to Massimo, I think that over 90% of us are behind him. Again excellent sum up Andy.

{Ed013's Note - I am looking into a link, will try and post it later}

7.) Excellent, cut and paste this in an email to the football league

8.) The most stunning piece of work i've ever seen on here. Congratulations and well said.

9.) 25 Mar 2014 16:44:19
What an excellent post Andy P, hope you sent it to MP's, PM, FL, FA and all who'll listen!

10.) Great post.

Why can't FL put the future of Leeds United 1st?
Why can't they put us the Fans 1st?
Why do they " interpret" their rules to the disadvantage of Leeds and to the advantage of other clubs?
Why can't they preserve the future of Leeds United by agreeing to accept a man who has " walked the talk" and INVESTED in Leeds?
How can competitor clubs judge us on this issue? Surely in their interests to stop us being properly funded?

Finally, will the FL be grown up and realise that the biggest crowd pullers ( and hence money for all the other FL clubs) are in serious danger of going under. Why don't you protect the financial interests of the other FL clubs and allow us to survive?

WHO in the FL is going to be man enough to appreciate the danger here and allow Cellino to be our saviour. Do they really want a massive FL member to die with possible knock on impact on other clubs.

I really hope that the FL take their duty of care to preserve the survival of its members as their number 1 priority and allow Leeds a United to survive. Over to you at the FL to show that you actually do care.

AltrinchamWhite

andy.powell has no Rumour Replies

andy.powell has no Banter Replies