07 Jan 2017 00:08:41
I really hope that signing Ashley Fletcher is just a rumour if he isn't good enough for West Ham and the position there in then he isn't good enough for us. M. O. T

1.) 07 Jan 2017
07 Jan 2017 08:56:00
He's a young, developing player. Just because he isn't ready for the Prem yet doesn't mean he never will be and certainly doesn't mean he couldn't do a very good job for us in the championship as we help him to develop further. Very strange post.

2.) 07 Jan 2017
07 Jan 2017 11:48:53
Young developing player? Don't we have that already in the development squad. Fletcher doesn't look that much better than Wilks.

3.) 07 Jan 2017
07 Jan 2017 13:00:51
Bartley couldn't get a game for Swansea and Jansson for Torino, if Monk thinks he can get more out of Fletcher than West Ham can then I trust his judgement. Garrys track record for picking players for us is pretty impressive (grimes excluded)

4.) 07 Jan 2017
07 Jan 2017 14:52:46
I hope we don't sign him. He rejected us for West Ham in the summer. I don't get the impression that he has any loyalty or that he would even try to resist the urge of a bumper pay packet. I think he has potential and monk would get the best from him, but I don't like the attitude.

5.) 08 Jan 2017
08 Jan 2017 10:37:55
Fletcher is a no from me . We have to do better than that . He's a one goal in six games kind of player.

6.) 08 Jan 2017
08 Jan 2017 16:49:46
Fletcher is a yes from me. Mainly limited to sub appearances when games have gone. 15 mins here or there. No way in a team like that can you have confidence to play your game. He'll come to us and you'll see the proper player there. Would prefer to have seen more of Antonsson though.