Leeds Rumours Member Posts


WRover's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



WRover's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To WRover's Posts



To WRover's last 5 banter posts


To WRover's last 5 rumour replies


WRover has no Rumours Posts



WRover's banter posts with other poster's replies to WRover's banter posts


18 May 2015 10:02:47
Looks like Cellino has flaunted FA rules again. FA looking into R.Mc transfer and payment to unauthorised agent. Nothing easy with Cellino.




24 Feb 2015 17:40:48
So, where do LUFC go now . MC says he will not return when his ban ends.
"Another fine mess you got us into Stanley".


1.) 24 Feb 2015 18:37:26
Do you think he had been looking for a buyer sincerely he got banned and has now found one

2.) 24 Feb 2015 19:10:48
No. doubt it



05 Nov 2014 16:46:53
So. MC has come out and said he "Cant get a mortgage" to buy ER back. What the hell is wrong with using a small portion of the family millions to do this.


1.) 05 Nov 2014 17:51:02
I was of the understanding that he is not pushing forward to buy back ER because of his so called partners and their dodgy dealing! GFH have not signed to take responsibility to write off the debt they had verbally agreed to. If MC buys back ER then their 25% stake is worth more and if they are not playing the game then why should he pay out for their gain? I completely sympathise with his thought process - if indeed my understanding of the situation is correct.

2.) Rover
According to his interview on Monday he is trying to buy ER before Xmas but wants the shareholders (I'm guessing GFH) to back him!!
Would you put ALL the money up if you wasn't the sole owner?

3.) I think you are spot on peacock. That's what Cellino said on radio Leeds.



07 Aug 2014 13:43:38
Billy, Billy, Billy Sharp. well, its possible.




02 Jul 2014 08:18:25
What is happening at LUFC, have to wash own kit, have to take packed lunches to TA, there is cost cutting and taking the P***. Players very unhappy.


1.) Rover, who, apart from the gutter press, says the players are unhappy? Apart that is from the ones who are leaving. Surgery was required, Dr Cellino is applying it but that does not make him Frankenstein




WRover's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

07 May 2015 09:04:04
He has to sit the test again first. Will he pass it, who knows, there is another case looming of tax evasion.




Click To View This Thread

True things will change, But will it be better or worse for LUFC.

See here.

2014-15: Losses of no more than £3m, up to £6m with owner investment

2015-16: Losses of no more than £2m, up to £13m with owner investment




Click To View This Thread

Work it out from this.

The clubs will still be allowed to sign players in January if they have 24 or fewer players over the age of 21 who have made at least five starting appearances for the club in total.

Any of these signings must not cost the club a transfer fee and must cost less than £600,000 a year.

Clubs with 24 or more players fitting the criteria will be allowed to trade players on a 'one out, one in' basis.

In addition:

•Clubs under an FFP embargo will be permitted to sign a goalkeeper on an emergency basis, in line with existing regulations.
•Clubs under an FFP embargo will not be permitted to pay transfer fees or compensation fees for professional players.
•Clubs under an FFP embargo will not be permitted to pay a loan fee to another club, they may only pay the player's wage, or a contribution towards it.
•For incoming players, clubs can only pay agents' fees as a benefit in kind to the player in question, as long as they do not exceed the £600,000 employee costs limit.




Click To View This Thread

Don't hold your breath on that one. Time a plenty was given for a "White Knight Billionaire" to come in pre MC, did one, no, so why would it happen now.




Click To View This Thread


Don't be so silly, some "Convictions" are ever spent, and as for the dates you mention, if MC is appealing then the case is not over, if appeal fails that is conviction date, not months ago.





WRover has no Banter Replies